Cybersecurity statistics about code
Showing 1-20 of 48 results
25% of all sensitive data disclosures involve technical data, with 65% of that consisting of proprietary source code copied into generative AI tools.
72% of organizations believe that AI leads to faster time to market.
79% of organizations believe that AI improves code quality.
100% of organizations confirmed having AI-generated code in their codebases.
81% of organizations lack full visibility into how and where AI is being used across the software development lifecycle.
78% of organizations believe that AI increases productivity.
30% of organizations state that AI now creates the majority of code in their organizations.
97% of organizations are using or piloting AI coding assistants.
42% of organizations conduct code reviews and security testing.
29% of manipulation concerns in the gig economy by 2026 will be related to app tampering/code injection.
26% of respondents ranked app tampering / code injection as their biggest manipulation challenge currently in the gig economy.
28% of Indians say QR codes would increase their trust more than any other method when engaging with brands online.
98% of organisations experienced a breach stemming from vulnerable code in the past year.
81% of organisations knowingly ship vulnerable code.
81% of organisations knowingly ship vulnerable code.
Fewer than half of the CISOs, AppSec managers and developers report deploying foundational security tools like dynamic application security testing (DAST) or infrastructure-as-code scanning.
Code leakage was the most common type of sensitive data sent to GenAI tools.
55% of respondents conduct independent code reviews.
When given a choice between a secure and insecure method to write code, GenAI models chose the insecure option 45% of the time.
LLMs failed to secure code against cross-site scripting (CWE-80) in 86% of cases.